Hi there,
So, similar to my question about the "Power of Questions" section, I was curious about how best to realistically apply the communication hierarchy within the context of student interactions that are much briefer than the context that this was apparently originally developed for (marriage counseling). I am graduate trained in marriage counseling, among other types, and was unfamiliar with this particular tool, but I do know that it would be unrealistic for us to be able to regularly reach higher level stages like the top of the pyramid (the bonding stage) with contact with students unless we had been working with them very often and regularly and established a real connection. I know that in this module there was a big focus on the "mutual interest" stage between both the advisor and student and the student and potential institution, and this is certainly more attainable and fairly realistic given the work that we do (helping match student interests and needs to potential institutions and programs).
I'm also curious if you have recommendations for deepening the "mutual interest" stage beyond the usual identification that a student's basic academic and career goals match with the institution and program.
Thanks, and looking forward to your reply.